# Von Neumann algebra

In mathematics, a **von Neumann algebra** or **W*-algebra** is a *-algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology and contains the identity operator. It is a special type of C*-algebra.

Von Neumann algebras were originally introduced by John von Neumann, motivated by his study of single operators, group representations, ergodic theory and quantum mechanics. His double commutant theorem shows that the analytic definition is equivalent to a purely algebraic definition as an algebra of symmetries.

Von Neumann algebras were first studied by von Neumann (1930) in 1929; he and Francis Murray developed the basic theory, under the original name of **rings of operators**, in a series of papers written in the 1930s and 1940s (F.J. Murray & J. von Neumann 1936, 1937, 1943; J. von Neumann 1938, 1940, 1943, 1949), reprinted in the collected works of von Neumann (1961).

Introductory accounts of von Neumann algebras are given in the online notes of Jones (2003) and Wassermann (1991) and the books by Dixmier (1981), Schwartz (1967), Blackadar (2005) and Sakai (1971). The three volume work by Takesaki (1979) gives an encyclopedic account of the theory. The book by Connes (1994) discusses more advanced topics.

The first and most common way is to define them as weakly closed *-algebras of bounded operators (on a Hilbert space) containing the identity. In this definition the weak (operator) topology can be replaced by many other common topologies including the strong, ultrastrong or ultraweak operator topologies. The *-algebras of bounded operators that are closed in the norm topology are C*-algebras, so in particular any von Neumann algebra is a C*-algebra.

The second definition is that a von Neumann algebra is a subalgebra of the bounded operators closed under involution (the *-operation) and equal to its double commutant, or equivalently the commutant of some subalgebra closed under *. The von Neumann double commutant theorem (von Neumann 1930) says that the first two definitions are equivalent.

The first two definitions describe a von Neumann algebra concretely as a set of operators acting on some given Hilbert space. Sakai (1971) showed that von Neumann algebras can also be defined abstractly as C*-algebras that have a predual; in other words the von Neumann algebra, considered as a Banach space, is the dual of some other Banach space called the predual. The predual of a von Neumann algebra is in fact unique up to isomorphism. Some authors use "von Neumann algebra" for the algebras together with a Hilbert space action, and "W*-algebra" for the abstract concept, so a von Neumann algebra is a W*-algebra together with a Hilbert space and a suitable faithful unital action on the Hilbert space. The concrete and abstract definitions of a von Neumann algebra are similar to the concrete and abstract definitions of a C*-algebra, which can be defined either as norm-closed *-algebras of operators on a Hilbert space, or as Banach *-algebras such that ||*aa**||=||*a*|| ||*a**||.

Some of the terminology in von Neumann algebra theory can be confusing, and the terms often have different meanings outside the subject.

By forgetting about the topology on a von Neumann algebra, we can consider it a (unital) *-algebra, or just a ring. Von Neumann algebras are semihereditary: every finitely generated submodule of a projective module is itself projective. There have been several attempts to axiomatize the underlying rings of von Neumann algebras, including Baer *-rings and AW*-algebras. The *-algebra of affiliated operators of a finite von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann regular ring. (The von Neumann algebra itself is in general not von Neumann regular.)

The relationship between commutative von Neumann algebras and measure spaces is analogous to that between commutative C*-algebras and locally compact Hausdorff spaces. Every commutative von Neumann algebra is isomorphic to *L*^{∞}(*X*) for some measure space (*X*, μ) and conversely, for every σ-finite measure space *X*, the *-algebra *L*^{∞}(*X*) is a von Neumann algebra.

Due to this analogy, the theory of von Neumann algebras has been called noncommutative measure theory, while the theory of C*-algebras is sometimes called noncommutative topology (Connes 1994).

Operators *E* in a von Neumann algebra for which *E* = *EE* = *E** are called **projections**; they are exactly the operators which give an orthogonal projection of *H* onto some closed subspace. A subspace of the Hilbert space *H* is said to **belong to** the von Neumann algebra *M* if it is the image of some projection in *M*. This establishes a 1:1 correspondence between projections of *M* and subspaces that belong to *M*. Informally these are the closed subspaces that can be described using elements of *M*, or that *M* "knows" about.

It can be shown that the closure of the image of any operator in *M* and the kernel of any operator in *M* belongs to *M*. Also, the closure of the image under an operator of *M* of any subspace belonging to *M* also belongs to *M*. (These results are a consequence of the polar decomposition).

The basic theory of projections was worked out by Murray & von Neumann (1936). Two subspaces belonging to *M* are called (**Murray–von Neumann**) **equivalent** if there is a partial isometry mapping the first isomorphically onto the other that is an element of the von Neumann algebra (informally, if *M* "knows" that the subspaces are isomorphic). This induces a natural equivalence relation on projections by defining *E* to be equivalent to *F* if the corresponding subspaces are equivalent, or in other words if there is a partial isometry of *H* that maps the image of *E* isometrically to the image of *F* and is an element of the von Neumann algebra. Another way of stating this is that *E* is equivalent to *F* if *E=uu** and *F=u*u* for some partial isometry *u* in *M*.

The equivalence relation ~ thus defined is additive in the following sense: Suppose *E*_{1} ~ *F*_{1} and *E*_{2} ~ *F*_{2}. If *E*_{1} ⊥ *E*_{2} and *F*_{1} ⊥ *F*_{2}, then *E*_{1} + *E*_{2} ~ *F*_{1} + *F*_{2}. Additivity would *not* generally hold if one were to require unitary equivalence in the definition of ~, i.e. if we say *E* is equivalent to *F* if *u*Eu* = *F* for some unitary *u*.

The subspaces belonging to *M* are partially ordered by inclusion, and this induces a partial order ≤ of projections. There is also a natural partial order on the set of *equivalence classes* of projections, induced by the partial order ≤ of projections. If *M* is a factor, ≤ is a total order on equivalence classes of projections, described in the section on traces below.

A projection (or subspace belonging to *M*) *E* is said to be a **finite projection** if there is no projection *F* < *E* (meaning *F* ≤ *E* and *F* ≠ *E*) that is equivalent to *E*. For example, all finite-dimensional projections (or subspaces) are finite (since isometries between Hilbert spaces leave the dimension fixed), but the identity operator on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is not finite in the von Neumann algebra of all bounded operators on it, since it is isometrically isomorphic to a proper subset of itself. However it is possible for infinite dimensional subspaces to be finite.

Orthogonal projections are noncommutative analogues of indicator functions in *L*^{∞}(**R**). *L*^{∞}(**R**) is the ||·||_{∞}-closure of the subspace generated by the indicator functions. Similarly, a von Neumann algebra is generated by its projections; this is a consequence of the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators.

A von Neumann algebra *N* whose center consists only of multiples of the identity operator is called a **factor**. Von Neumann (1949) showed that every von Neumann algebra on a separable Hilbert space is isomorphic to a direct integral of factors. This decomposition is essentially unique. Thus, the problem of classifying isomorphism classes of von Neumann algebras on separable Hilbert spaces can be reduced to that of classifying isomorphism classes of factors.

Murray & von Neumann (1936) showed that every factor has one of 3 types as described below. The type classification can be extended to von Neumann algebras that are not factors, and a von Neumann algebra is of type X if it can be decomposed as a direct integral of type X factors; for example, every commutative von Neumann algebra has type I_{1}. Every von Neumann algebra can be written uniquely as a sum of von Neumann algebras of types I, II, and III.

There are several other ways to divide factors into classes that are sometimes used:

A factor is said to be of **type I** if there is a minimal projection *E ≠ 0*, i.e. a projection *E* such that there is no other projection *F* with 0 < *F* < *E*. Any factor of type I is isomorphic to the von Neumann algebra of *all* bounded operators on some Hilbert space; since there is one Hilbert space for every cardinal number, isomorphism classes of factors of type I correspond exactly to the cardinal numbers. Since many authors consider von Neumann algebras only on separable Hilbert spaces, it is customary to call the bounded operators on a Hilbert space of finite dimension *n* a factor of type I_{n}, and the bounded operators on a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, a factor of type I_{∞}.

A factor is said to be of **type II** if there are no minimal projections but there are non-zero finite projections. This implies that every projection *E* can be “halved” in the sense that there are two projections *F* and *G* that are Murray–von Neumann equivalent and satisfy *E* = *F* + *G*. If the identity operator in a type II factor is finite, the factor is said to be of type II_{1}; otherwise, it is said to be of type II_{∞}. The best understood factors of type II are the hyperfinite type II_{1} factor and the hyperfinite type II_{∞} factor, found by Murray & von Neumann (1936). These are the unique hyperfinite factors of types II_{1} and II_{∞}; there are an uncountable number of other factors of these types that are the subject of intensive study. Murray & von Neumann (1937) proved the fundamental result that a factor of type II_{1} has a unique finite tracial state, and the set of traces of projections is [0,1].

A factor of type II_{∞} has a semifinite trace, unique up to rescaling, and the set of traces of projections is [0,∞]. The set of real numbers λ such that there is an automorphism rescaling the trace by a factor of λ is called the **fundamental group** of the type II_{∞} factor.

The tensor product of a factor of type II_{1} and an infinite type I factor has type II_{∞}, and conversely any factor of type II_{∞} can be constructed like this. The **fundamental group** of a type II_{1} factor is defined to be the fundamental group of its tensor product with the infinite (separable) factor of type I. For many years it was an open problem to find a type II factor whose fundamental group was not the group of positive reals, but Connes then showed that the von Neumann group algebra of a countable discrete group with Kazhdan's property (T) (the trivial representation is isolated in the dual space), such as SL(3,**Z**), has a countable fundamental group. Subsequently, Sorin Popa showed that the fundamental group can be trivial for certain groups, including the semidirect product of **Z**^{2} by SL(2,**Z**).

An example of a type II_{1} factor is the von Neumann group algebra of a countable infinite discrete group such that every non-trivial conjugacy class is infinite.
McDuff (1969) found an uncountable family of such groups with non-isomorphic von Neumann group algebras, thus showing the existence of uncountably many different separable type II_{1} factors.

Lastly, **type III** factors are factors that do not contain any nonzero finite projections at all. In their first paper Murray & von Neumann (1936) were unable to decide whether or not they existed; the first examples were later found by von Neumann (1940). Since the identity operator is always infinite in those factors, they were sometimes called type III_{∞} in the past, but recently that notation has been superseded by the notation III_{λ}, where λ is a real number in the interval [0,1]. More precisely, if the Connes spectrum (of its modular group) is 1 then the factor is of type III_{0}, if the Connes spectrum is all integral powers of λ for 0 < λ < 1, then the type is III_{λ}, and if the Connes spectrum is all positive reals then the type is III_{1}. (The Connes spectrum is a closed subgroup of the positive reals, so these are the only possibilities.) The only trace on type III factors takes value ∞ on all non-zero positive elements, and any two non-zero projections are equivalent. At one time type III factors were considered to be intractable objects, but Tomita–Takesaki theory has led to a good structure theory. In particular, any type III factor can be written in a canonical way as the crossed product of a type II_{∞} factor and the real numbers.

Any von Neumann algebra *M* has a **predual** *M*_{∗}, which is the Banach space of all ultraweakly continuous linear functionals on *M*. As the name suggests, *M* is (as a Banach space) the dual of its predual. The predual is unique in the sense that any other Banach space whose dual is *M* is canonically isomorphic to *M*_{∗}. Sakai (1971) showed that the existence of a predual characterizes von Neumann algebras among C* algebras.

The definition of the predual given above seems to depend on the choice of Hilbert space that *M* acts on, as this determines the ultraweak topology. However the predual can also be defined without using the Hilbert space that *M* acts on, by defining it to be the space generated by all positive **normal** linear functionals on *M*. (Here "normal" means that it preserves suprema when applied to increasing nets of self adjoint operators; or equivalently to increasing sequences of projections.)

The predual *M*_{∗} is a closed subspace of the dual *M** (which consists of all norm-continuous linear functionals on *M*) but is generally smaller. The proof that *M*_{∗} is (usually) not the same as *M** is nonconstructive and uses the axiom of choice in an essential way; it is very hard to exhibit explicit elements of *M** that are not in *M*_{∗}. For example, exotic positive linear forms on the von Neumann algebra *l*^{∞}(*Z*) are given by free ultrafilters; they correspond to exotic *-homomorphisms into *C* and describe the Stone–Čech compactification of *Z*.

Weights and their special cases states and traces are discussed in detail in (Takesaki 1979).

Any factor has a trace such that the trace of a non-zero projection is non-zero and the trace of a projection is infinite if and only if the projection is infinite. Such a trace is unique up to rescaling. For factors that are separable or finite, two projections are equivalent if and only if they have the same trace. The type of a factor can be read off from the possible values of this trace over the projections of the factor, as follows:

If a von Neumann algebra acts on a Hilbert space containing a norm 1 vector *v*, then the functional *a* → (*av*,*v*) is a normal state. This construction can be reversed to give an action on a Hilbert space from a normal state: this is the GNS construction for normal states.

Given an abstract separable factor, one can ask for a classification of its modules, meaning the separable Hilbert spaces that it acts on. The answer is given as follows: every such module *H* can be given an *M*-dimension dim_{M}(*H*) (not its dimension as a complex vector space) such that modules are isomorphic if and only if they have the same *M*-dimension. The *M*-dimension is additive, and a module is isomorphic to a subspace of another module if and only if it has smaller or equal *M*-dimension.

A module is called **standard** if it has a cyclic separating vector. Each factor has a standard representation, which is unique up to isomorphism. The standard representation has an antilinear involution *J* such that *JMJ* = *M′*. For finite factors the standard module is given by the GNS construction applied to the unique normal tracial state and the *M*-dimension is normalized so that the standard module has *M*-dimension 1, while for infinite factors the standard module is the module with *M*-dimension equal to ∞.

Connes (1976) and others proved that the following conditions on a von Neumann algebra *M* on a separable Hilbert space *H* are all **equivalent**:

There is no generally accepted term for the class of algebras above; Connes has suggested that **amenable** should be the standard term.

The amenable factors have been classified: there is a unique one of each of the types I_{n}, I_{∞}, II_{1}, II_{∞}, III_{λ}, for 0 < λ ≤ 1, and the ones of type III_{0} correspond to certain ergodic flows. (For type III_{0} calling this a classification is a little misleading, as it is known that there is no easy way to classify the corresponding ergodic flows.) The ones of type I and II_{1} were classified by Murray & von Neumann (1943), and the remaining ones were classified by Connes (1976), except for the type III_{1} case which was completed by Haagerup.

All amenable factors can be constructed using the **group-measure space construction** of Murray and von Neumann for a single ergodic transformation. In fact they are precisely the factors arising as crossed products by free ergodic actions of *Z* or *Z/nZ* on abelian von Neumann algebras *L*^{∞}(*X*). Type I factors occur when the measure space *X* is atomic and the action transitive. When *X* is diffuse or non-atomic, it is equivalent to [0,1] as a measure space. Type II factors occur when *X* admits an equivalent finite (II_{1}) or infinite (II_{∞}) measure, invariant under an action of *Z*. Type III factors occur in the remaining cases where there is no invariant measure, but only an invariant measure class: these factors are called **Krieger factors**.

The Hilbert space tensor product of two Hilbert spaces is the completion of their algebraic tensor product. One can define a tensor product of von Neumann algebras (a completion of the algebraic tensor product of the algebras considered as rings), which is again a von Neumann algebra, and act on the tensor product of the corresponding Hilbert spaces. The tensor product of two finite algebras is finite, and the tensor product of an infinite algebra and a non-zero algebra is infinite. The type of the tensor product of two von Neumann algebras (I, II, or III) is the maximum of their types. The **commutation theorem for tensor products** states that

The tensor product of an infinite number of von Neumann algebras, if done naively, is usually a ridiculously large non-separable algebra. Instead von Neumann (1938) showed that one should choose a state on each of the von Neumann algebras, use this to define a state on the algebraic tensor product, which can be used to produce a Hilbert space and a (reasonably small) von Neumann algebra. Araki & Woods (1968) studied the case where all the factors are finite matrix algebras; these factors are called **Araki–Woods** factors or **ITPFI factors** (ITPFI stands for "infinite tensor product of finite type I factors"). The type of the infinite tensor product can vary dramatically as the states are changed; for example, the infinite tensor product of an infinite number of type I_{2} factors can have any type depending on the choice of states. In particular Powers (1967) found an uncountable family of non-isomorphic hyperfinite type III_{λ} factors for 0 < λ < 1, called **Powers factors**, by taking an infinite tensor product of type I_{2} factors, each with the state given by:

All hyperfinite von Neumann algebras not of type III_{0} are isomorphic to Araki–Woods factors, but there are uncountably many of type III_{0} that are not.

A **bimodule** (or correspondence) is a Hilbert space *H* with module actions of two commuting von Neumann algebras. Bimodules have a much richer structure than that of modules. Any bimodule over two factors always gives a subfactor since one of the factors is always contained in the commutant of the other. There is also a subtle relative tensor product operation due to Connes on bimodules. The theory of subfactors, initiated by Vaughan Jones, reconciles these two seemingly different points of view.

Bimodules are also important for the von Neumann group algebra *M* of a discrete group Γ. Indeed, if *V* is any unitary representation of Γ, then, regarding Γ as the diagonal subgroup of Γ × Γ, the corresponding induced representation on *l*^{2 }(Γ, *V*) is naturally a bimodule for two commuting copies of *M*. Important representation theoretic properties of Γ can be formulated entirely in terms of bimodules and therefore make sense for the von Neumann algebra itself. For example, Connes and Jones gave a definition of an analogue of Kazhdan's property (T) for von Neumann algebras in this way.

Von Neumann algebras of type I are always amenable, but for the other types there are an uncountable number of different non-amenable factors, which seem very hard to classify, or even distinguish from each other. Nevertheless, Voiculescu has shown that the class of non-amenable factors coming from the group-measure space construction is **disjoint** from the class coming from group von Neumann algebras of free groups. Later Narutaka Ozawa proved that group von Neumann algebras of hyperbolic groups yield prime type II_{1} factors, i.e. ones that cannot be factored as tensor products of type II_{1} factors, a result first proved by Leeming Ge for free group factors using Voiculescu's free entropy. Popa's work on fundamental groups of non-amenable factors represents another significant advance. The theory of factors "beyond the hyperfinite" is rapidly expanding at present, with many new and surprising results; it has close links with rigidity phenomena in geometric group theory and ergodic theory.

Von Neumann algebras have found applications in diverse areas of mathematics like knot theory, statistical mechanics, Quantum field theory, Local quantum physics, Free probability, Noncommutative geometry, representation theory, geometry, and probability.

For instance, C*-algebra provides an alternative axiomatization to probability theory. In this case the method goes by the name of Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction. This is analogous to the two approaches to measure and integration, where one has the choice to construct measures of sets first and define integrals later, or construct integrals first and define set measures as integrals of characteristic functions.